<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>LockedInALocker on Gromet's Plaza Archive</title><link>/authors/lockedinalocker/</link><description>Recent content in LockedInALocker on Gromet's Plaza Archive</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/authors/lockedinalocker/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Scary Cage Escape Struggle</title><link>/stories/2009/01/26/scary-cage-escape-struggle/</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/stories/2009/01/26/scary-cage-escape-struggle/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In the winter of 2008, I had a rather hairy experience in a cage I was locked into, and it was ultimately due to a moment of carelessness that I should have known better about.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This reinforced the importance of carefully observing one of the basic rules I believe anyone who engages in any form of self-bondage or -confinement should observe, relating to combination padlocks. I will explain this briefly, and will then relate the incident that happened to me just recently because I didn&amp;rsquo;t pay full attention to this, and thus breached a fundamental rule that should apply to any use of combination locks - especially in solo play.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>