<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Bill Roberts on Gromet's Plaza Archive</title><link>/authors/bill-roberts/</link><description>Recent content in Bill Roberts on Gromet's Plaza Archive</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/authors/bill-roberts/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Electronic Stocks &amp; Bonds</title><link>/stories/2003/02/16/electronic-stocks-bonds/</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/stories/2003/02/16/electronic-stocks-bonds/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Several stories posted on this site (“Computer Bondage”
, “Remote Controlled”, and “Zipped and Shocked”) brought to mind a self-bondage
computer program I created a while back.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wanted something controlled by an external entity.
I wanted uncertainty about how long I would be restrained (and no way to
intervene once locked up). As a practical matter, I needed to be able to
set outer time limits. I wanted “torture” while locked up—also unpredictable
and uncontrollable.
What I Came Up With&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>